National Policy Agenda

2014 NASSTRAC
National Policy Agenda


2014 National Policy Agenda

 

Please click on the link above to learn more about NASSTRAC's policy priorities for 2014. 

Join NASSTRAC

NASSTRAC invests 3.5% of its total operating expenses toward advocacy issues. Member benefits Include:

  • Education through FreightAdvocacy.org
  • Advocacy alerts
  • Filings
  • Coordinated letter-writing and grass roots efforts
  • Fly-Ins to Washington
  • Collaborative initiatives with other associations


Join NASSTRAC

Recent Filings

> View all filings

 

Perspectives

NASSTRAC Applauds Supreme Court Ruling on Challenge to L.A. Port Drayage Rules

By Brian Everett, NASSTRAC Executive Director (June 17, 2013)

 


 

The Truck Weight Debate Returns To Capitol Hill

By Mike Regan, NASSTRAC Advocacy Chairman (May 29, 2013)


Opposes Unwarranted Higher Class Ratings

NASSTRAC Opposes Unwarranted Higher Class Ratings on Pallets, Platforms, Racks, Skids

NASSTRAC has expressed its opposition to the proposal by Roadrunner Transportation Services to modify Item 640 of CCSB Docket No. 2011-2, Section 1, Subject 9. The proposal would lead to unwarranted higher class ratings on pallets, platforms, racks or skids used with most mixed unitized shipments. This opposition was expressed in a letter to the National Motor Freight Traffic Association's Commodity Classification Standards Board May 4, 2011. 

Roadrunner argues, in support of its proposal, that the current rule, under which such pallets or skids are assigned the same class rating as the lowest-rated commodity shipped on the pallet or skid, is objectionable because there might be other commodities on the pallet or skid whose transportation characteristics are more "representative" of the characteristics of all the goods being shipped, according to the letter.

This proposal makes no sense, either as a matter of logic or as a matter of CCSB policy, said John Cutler, NASSTRAC's legal counsel. "If a mixed pallet included a preponderance of goods with stowability, liability or handling issues, would it make sense to assume that the pallet or skid has similar characteristics? Obviously not."

There is also no evidence of record that NASSTRAC sees to support any contention that the current rule leads to assigning inaccurate class ratings to pallets and skids, or that Roadrunner's proposal would lead to assigned ratings that come closer to class ratings reflecting actual pallet densities than the current rule, said Cutler. "NASSTRAC believes the proposal would lead to less accurate class ratings that are higher than warranted under acceptable CCSB policies and practices."

According to NASSTRAC's letter to the NMFTA, the support for the proposal appears to be inadequate and speculative or anecdotal, and the reasoning appears fallacious. NASSTRAC joined Waddington North America, Inc., a NASSTRAC member, in urging CCSB to reject Roadrunner's proposed change in Item 640.

To view the letter, click here: